Cailee Spaeny and John Boyega in Pacific Rim: Uprising. Image courtesy Universal Pictures. |
Sequels
should very, very, very rarely start
off by
reusing footage from the original film. It
shows the filmmakers have little faith in their audience's ability to
keep up with the changes in the sequel while showing a lack of
narrative enterprise or ingenuity, lazily rehashing previous efforts.
It hurts even more when the previous footage is better than anything
the movie has to showcase from its own stock. Which
is
the case with Pacific
Rim: Uprising,
a movie that starts off on the wrong foot and is never able, or
particularly willing, to steady itself.
What
makes the choice strange is how much of the time invested in
rehashing old history could be used to improve the sloppy narrative
Pacific
Rim:Uprising
tosses together. At the film's heart is a redemption tale for the
very lost Jake Pentecost (John Boyega), the son of a
legendary Jaeger pilot who died in the first film. That
narrative is more than enough to build out a quality
movie, providing a pretty solid actor a showcase to build out a
character while interspersing some desirable
robot versus monster action. But the filmmakers plug
in little bits of additional plot lines to muddy
the story up. Inserted into the story are a
precocious Jaeger cadet Amara (Cailee Spaeny) and her fellow cadets,
an ambitious billionaire business owner Shao (Tian Jing), Jake's old
friend and current rival Nate Lambert (Scott Eastwood), and a
few returning
players (Rinko Kikuchi, Burn Gorman, and Charlie Day)
engaging in some shenanigans.
There's also something that resembles a love triangle between Jake,
Nate and a woman named Jules (Adria Arjona), but nothing really comes
from it. Pacific
Rim: Uprising
throws together so many plots and subplots nothing is able to stick.
Characters aren't given adequate room to grow and evolve the way the
filmmakers (four writers, among them director Steven S. DeKnight)
expect.
Those
stories advance
in fits and spurts, with little increments that conclude almost
immediately without any actual validation. Amara, for example, has a
major crisis caused by a bad memory with the villainous Kaiju that
causes a legitimate breakdown that is ripe for character development.
Instead of showing her growth, the character
moves on with minimal effort made
to overcome the obstacle. Everyone effectively has their own version
of that problem.
Character growth isn't earned in this movie, it's told and shown.
It
really is hard though to escape the lack of impetus the writing team
has put into Pacific
Rim: Uprising.
The stakes for most of the movie are surprisingly low,
especially given the fate of humanity was in danger in the first
movie.
This movie de-escalates the
danger, hiding the threat
until the third act, with acts one and two dedicated to establishing
the characters poorly while setting up what resembles a political
thriller.
Without that stake, that hook for
the audience to grab onto,
Pacific
Rim: Uprising is
frightfully dull.
In
theory, the hook should be the fights between the Jaegers and Kaiju.
It's a really, really simple formula to follow, pitting giant
fighting robots against monsters rampaging their way through
metropolitan areas. This is the kind of idea that appeals to the
inner 7 year old because it is
fun and awesome. Even a modicum
of good
spectacle could easily have redeemed Pacific
Rim: Uprising,
at least enough to overlook the tremendous story and character flaws.
And, yet, the movie skimps on the monster action until the very end
of the film, providing less than a handful of monsters to fight
against the giant robots. The filmmakers effectively had one job to
do, but their push to incorporate so many stories in less than two
hours prevented them from supplying an adequate amount of monster
time.
It's
easy to say the film's problems are connected to the absence of
Guillermo del Toro from the creative process. And, yeah, Pacific
Rim: Uprising
would be a much better movie with del Toro helming it,
although that
can be said about a lot of movies.
But
this film shouldn't really need his presence to succeed either. What
the new filmmakers had was a fun, interesting premise to build at
least a good popcorn flick from. They
never found a direction, using the original as a crutch and
releasing a boring movie.
And a boring monster movie is a damn tragedy.
Target audience: People who watched the original Pacific Rim and the growing John Boyega fan club.
Take the whole family?: Kids 10 and older should be fine.
Review: Two out of Five Stars
Click here to see the trailer.
Rating: PG-13
Run time: 111 minutes
Genre: Action
Ask
Away
Target audience: People who watched the original Pacific Rim and the growing John Boyega fan club.
Take the whole family?: Kids 10 and older should be fine.
Theater
or Netflix?:
Just
stay at home and enjoy it there.
What
is up with that love triangle?: This
is the plot
that bothered me the most about Pacific
Rim: Uprising.
The filmmakers added an unnecessary love triangle between Jake, Nate
and Jules without any justification or true motivation behind it.
Even worse, Jules does little else in the move besides serve as an
object of mild affection for Jake and Nate. She’s
effectively
a reason for Jake and Nate to argue, which is an absolute waste of a
character.
Watch
this instead?: It's
cheesy as all heck, but Independence
Day
is still a pretty fun blockbuster that's worth a trip through memory
lane. And you can’t
go wrong with the
original Godzilla.
No comments:
Post a Comment