Melissa McCarthy in Life of the Party. Image courtesy Warner Bros. |
It’s incredibly perplexing watching Melissa McCarthy
the writer completely fail Melissa McCarthy the actress in Life
of the Party. McCarthy as an actress can be a
gifted performer, capable of injecting excitement into weak material while
delivering some quality pratfalls. McCarthy the writer is the type of
person who gives herself terrible material to work from. It’s the
great struggle of Life of the Party,
watching McCarthy battle McCarthy to win the viewer’s hearts and
minds. For the most part, McCarthy the actress rarely wins. To
be fair, McCarthy shares screenwriting credit with her husband
Ben
Falcone, who
also directs the film. (At the least, Life of
the Party is a family affair.) Together,
they have
written
a bland, often uninteresting comedy
with just a glimmer of interesting concepts.
Life
of the Party
is about as
basic as a
college movie
can get, with McCarthy’s newly divorced mom deciding to enroll at
the same college as her daughter
(Molly Gordon) to finish her degree. The premise
has
worked before with Rodney Dangerfield in McCarthy's role, although
Dangerfield had the advantage of a random, brilliant cameo by Kurt
Vonnegut. McCarthy has Christina Aguilera, which is not an upgrade.
That the movie doesn’t
really do anything interesting with this idea is not surprising. But
the premise
isn’t what
ultimately
fails Life
of the Party.
Rather, it's an exposition heavy script littered with plot holes and
some pretty weak jokes.
Exposition is pretty much the only reason the audience
knows what is going on at any given moment. Some
exposition is fine and necessary,
but Life
of the Party
overloads on it, using asinine
statements to reflect the passage of time and character status. Aside
being a sign of some very bad writing, it also reflects an absence of
creativity from McCarthy and Falcone, who have an entire college
campus and a myriad of methods (signs, events, holidays) to indicate
the passage of time.
Good movies don’t state that it’s Tuesday, they show it.
Even
with all the exposition Life
of the Party
is still a conundrum.
This is one of those “why” movies in which a person throws their
hands in the air and asks why something is at it is. The
characters don’t make bad decisions as much as they make bizarre
and awkward ones, doing things few rationale humans would opt to do.
And the exposition the film clutches too even refutes some of the
action shown on screen. There's
a whole speech in which Gordon rants at her mom for not taking
college seriously enough, despite the movie going out of its way to
show McCarthy as
an excellent student.
That
rant by Gordon's character is part of a poorly represented character
arc between her and McCarthy, one of the many little stories
the movie picks up and either drops or tells poorly.
Gordon’s
story is the most egregious, given how quickly she goes from loathing
her mom’s presence on campus to embracing it before hating it
again. Nothing is really earned in this movie; it’s just there.
Life
of the Party
is not a good
or even particularly mediocre movie,
but it isn't an abject failure either. A couple of jokes
land in interesting enough places to earn a chuckle or two. Maya
Rudolph and Stephen Root are both treasures, with Rudolph earning the
biggest laughs of the movie by just being herself. And running just
behind the background of McCarthy's flat shenanigans is a way more
interesting movie starring Gillian Jacobs and Heidi Gardner. Their
one brief interaction has the weirdest vibe to it, and each character
is weird
enough to belong to
a moderately twisted dark comedy that wrings laughs out of their
respective kookiness. It could be either a mark of Jacobs and Gardner
taking what they had and running with it, or perhaps a
sign that Falcone and McCarthy have a hidden, weird sense of humor
just waiting to come out.
Alas, the oddities are left behind a mundane and
uninteresting movie about self-discovery, one in which McCarthy has
to undergo a makeover to find social validation. Life
of the Party fleetingly allows its characters
to be unique and fun, only to put on the brakes and go back to some
boring, poorly developed point. For all the effort McCarthy clearly
puts into her performance, she constantly shoots herself in the foot
with poor dialog and jokes that meander to nowhere. McCarthy just
doesn’t isn’t a talented enough writer to write for herself.
Review: Two out of Five Stars
Click here to see the trailer.
Rating:
PG-13
Run
time: 105 minutes
Genre:
Comedy
Ask
Away
Target audience: Fans of Melissa McCarthy.
Target audience: Fans of Melissa McCarthy.
Take the whole family?: The content gets a skosh risque for young kids. And, really, this isn't interesting enough for them anyway.
Theater
or Netflix?:
Just
wait for a
streaming option if
you want to
see it.
How
is Ben Falcone as a director?: Based
on this film not good
in the least.
Falcone's style lacks
individuality or personality, along with any interest in using the
camera to tell a joke. Falcone seems to prefer to point the camera
and let things happen, which is a terrible way to direct a comedy.
Watch
this instead?:
Back
to School
isn’t the
greatest film, but Rodney Dangerfield sells the heck out of that
material. The best option is to watch the classic Simpsons
episode Homer Goes to College.
No comments:
Post a Comment