Michael Garza and Zoe Margaret Colletti in Scary Stories to Tell in the Dark. Image courtesy Lionsgate. |
Nostalgia is the
heartbeat of Scary Stories to Tell in the
Dark. From the retro 1960s setting to the familiarity of the folklore, Scary Stories is soaked in memories, of
childhoods spent reading under blankets with a flashlight in one hand and a
collection of macabre tales in the other. Scary
Stories gets a lot of mileage from that nostalgia, which elevates the film
in its more entertaining moments but hurts it when it strays too far from fond
memories.
Based on the eponymous
book series by Alvin Schwartz, Scary
Stories centers on life in a small Pennsylvania town right around Halloween
circa1968. Friends Stella (Zoe Margaret Colletti), Auggie (Gabriel Rush), and Chuck
(Austin Zajur) meet Ramón (Michael Garza) on Halloween night as they evade the
wraith of local sociopath Tommy (Austin Abrams). To complete their Halloween
adventure, they go to the abandoned mansion of Sarah Bellows, the focus of an
urban legend for her storytelling prowess and accusations of poisoning local
children a generation prior. Stella leaves the mansion with Sarah’s book of
scary stories, which soon start becoming all too real nightmares. Stella, her
friends, and Chuck’s sister Ruth (Natalie Ganzhorn) must figure out how they are
becoming characters in Sarah’s book before they vanish from existence.
The Scary Stories book series is beloved by millennials, serving as an
introduction to horror for many children. The series is an equally valuable
resource for understanding how these stories came to be, with Schwartz
outlining each story’s origins and how interpretations change across regions. But
the stories themselves are hit or miss: For every terrorizing short like Harold and The Wendigo there is a silly interlude like The Viper or The Hearse Song. The film focuses on the more
terrifying tales, driving home some of the fears inherent to the legends.
Director André Øvredal does a splendid job of developing a chilling, eerie, and
bizarre atmosphere for his retelling, ratcheting up the tension by disorienting
the characters and the audience. One of the driving themes of the movie is the
fatalism of life, how people react once they know their time is running out. Øvredal
often frames his stories to match this feeling of doom, tightening the
character’s environments until only the inevitable can occur.
And, honestly, the books
are less memorable for the stories – Schwartz’s storytelling is more
entertaining than discomfiting – than Stephen Gammell’s illustrations, which
often made the stories seem far more terrifying than they were. Scary Stories uses his art as
inspiration for its character design, and while the film doesn’t meet the level
of fear conjured by Gammell’s work – his style is too simple and brutal to nail
in film – it adds a bizarre feeling to the movie. There’s an appreciated
contrast between the reality of the film and the surreal nature of the art, particularly
with the characters in Harold and The Dream. They are in essence still
fantasies pulled into reality, never quite fitting into their surroundings and
thus standing out for their peculiarity.
Where things get a
little troublesome and where the film’s overarching shortcomings shift into
focus is the third act. Scary Stories
has difficulty finding an appropriate ending to the supernatural frights, shifting
instead to a generic pursuit with a lackluster resolution. The movie dedicates
so much of its efforts to setting an eerie environment while emphasizing efficient
storytelling that ending on an exposition-laden chase is tonally incorrect. The
resolution to the ghost problem is similarly off, failing to find a balance
between invoking terror and finding sympathy for the villain. Explaining why
the ghost is angry is more interesting as a concept than the results shown in the
movie, especially with an explanation as forced as rage. There’s also an
unnecessarily epic ghost scream because the filmmakers thought it appropriate to
have the ghost not go quietly into that good afterlife. The movie generally
falls short when it strays too far away from the stories and into generic
horror filmmaking, which hits the final act and spoils some of the good vibes.
Review: Three out of Five Stars
Click here to see the trailer.
Rating: PG-13
Run time: 111 minutes
Genre: Horror
tl;dr
What Worked: Atmosphere, Character Design, Folklore
What Fell Short: Third Act, Dialog, Character Motivation
What To Read/Watch As Well: The original book series, Trick ’r Treat, A Nightmare on Elm Street
No comments:
Post a Comment