Sam Rockwell and Paul Walter Hauser in Richard Jewell. Image courtesy Warner Bros. |
What's worrisome about Richard
Jewell is how far down the rabbit hole director Clint
Eastwood fell. The numerous splendid moments of filmmaking and the
brilliance of the dive into the film's central figure is nearly
overlapped by a pervading sense of paranoia from the director about
bureaucracy conspiring against an average white man. This is
Eastwood's millstone, an inability to see the humanity driving the
institutions he fears.
Richard Jewell stars Paul Walter
Hauser as the eponymous security guard, an unremarkable man who saves
hundreds of lives after discovering a bomb at the 1996 Olympics in
Atlanta. Despite the act of courage, Jewell's grandiose dreams and
odd past behavior draw the attention of FBI agent Tom Shaw (Jon
Hamm), who suspects Jewell planted the bomb himself to become famous.
Shaw leaks the investigation to tenacious reporter Kathy Scruggs
(Olivia Wilde), which instantly turns Jewell from a hero to a
villain. With the help of attorney Watson Bryant (Sam Rockwell) and
his mother Bobbi (Kathy Bates), Jewell fights against the forces
opposing him to clear his name.
Eastwood and screenwriter Billy Ray
dive incredibly deep into its central character to reveal a man whose
shining moment of competence nearly ruins his life. Underneath the
hushed voice and abundances of “sirs” is a man with a healthy ego
and aspirations for mild greatness as a law enforcement official.
Jewell is a legitimate hero who saved multiple lives, but Richard
Jewell isn't afraid to show the human side – especially the ego
– pushing that heroism. In an era defined by heroes who are so far
above human realism they are barely relatable, it is pleasant to see
a man's flaws result in an act of courage. To paraphrase an Emerson
quote, the difference between a hero and ordinary folk is five
minutes of courage, and the film mines a lot from that idea.
The humanity Eastwood and Ray provide
for Jewell are not afforded to the forces opposing him. The battle in
Richard Jewell is the fight between a decent guy and powerful
institutions – government and the media – out to ruin his life,
but the humans representing those forces come across as cartoonish in
comparison. Shaw's motivations are flat and uninvestigated, his
presence more stereotypical than nuanced. The film's portrayal of
Scruggs, whose name was not changed for this film, is far more
concerning. She's not only depicted not simply as a woman who is
willing to sleep with a source for information, but a terrible
journalist and even worse human being, celebrating the deaths of
innocent people to advance her career. And despite the film's take on
her reporting, her article was correct and had additional sourcing
the film implies did not exist.
Neither Shaw nor Scruggs should be a
villain in this film. They were two people doing their jobs in the
aftermath of incredible act of violence and terror, consumed by a
need to rush for truth and information. They were human, yet Eastwood
and Ray cannot find that humanity. This is becoming a trend for
Eastwood, who took a similar approach with Sully. In both
film, the actions of the main characters are impugned by governmental
investigation to the point the terror of the initial actions are
overshadowed by the bureaucracy. Even if the case against Richard
Jewell was untrue, the idea the government overstepped by conducting
an investigation is ludicrous. Yet this is the worldview Eastwood
presents in Richard Jewell, a fever dream in which good white
men are persecuted for their good deeds. These ideas permeate so deep
into this film it overshadows some stellar filmmaking. The sequence
when Jewell first finds the bomb through the inevitable explosion is
filled with brilliant tension worthy of Hitchcock. Eastwood plays
with the audience's knowledge that the bomb will go off, throwing in
some hints of a timeline to mess with perspective and keep the actual
moment of detonation a shock to viewers. That moment should be the
film's centerpiece, yet Eastwood gets so lost in the ensuing legal
issues the power of that moment becomes window dressing. Richard
Jewell is a good film, but Eastwood pursuit of victimhood
prevents his film from becoming anything more than that.
Review:
Four out of Five Stars
Click
here
to see the trailer.
Rating:
R
Run
time: 129 minutes
Genre:
Drama
tl;dr
What
Worked: Richard
Jewell, Paul Walter Hauser
What
Fell Short: Secondary
Characters, Politics, Lazy Foreshadowing
What
To Watch As Well:
Shattered
Glass
No comments:
Post a Comment