Showing posts with label Ciaran Hinds. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ciaran Hinds. Show all posts

Friday, October 12, 2018

First Man a stunning trip through space and time

Ryan Gosling in First Man. Image courtesy Universal Pictures.
The driving force of First Man isn't the figure at the center of the movie. The biography of the first man to step foot on the moon is a justification for the filmmakers to take the audience through a visually stunning journey into space. It's a dream and an example of wish fulfillment, the hope of achieving something beyond the realm of a possibility for eons. That the man who actually took those first steps is otherwise unspectacular proves one of the points of the film; dreams don't belong to the most talented, but to the dreamers with drive and tenacity.

First Man provides a snapshot of the life of Neil Armstrong, the eponymous American astronaut played by Canadian Ryan Gosling. The movie opens with Armstrong working as a test pilot in 1961, living a quiet life with his wife Janet (Claire Foy) and children. After the death of their daughter Karen, Neil applies to work as a pilot on the Gemini program, the precursor to the Apollo missions to reach the moon. The ensuing years up to 1969 are a series of trial and errors for NASA and the multitude of scientists and pilots (played by a collection of character actors like Ciarán Hinds, Kyle Chandler, Corey Stoll, Lukas Haas, Jason Clarke, Ethan Embry) who put their lives at risk to get to the moon.

There is a soupcon of jingoism inherent in that description, a sense of American exceptionalism director Damien Chazelle and writer Josh Singer grapple with throughout the film. Some of the issue is just the setting, as it seems highly difficult to make a movie about the 1960s without associating it with some levels of idealism and hope. Chazelle and Singer try to cut through it by tossing references to protests against NASA and the space program on the outskirts, which don't succeed at tempering the accidental patriotism but do add a political action this movie didn't intend to have. To avoid being too dangerously patriotic, the filmmakers teased a part of their history that should have been either directly approached or ignored for the sake of storytelling.

Then again, the film is not really about how man landed on the film. Based on the title, it would appear First Man is about Armstrong and his heroics, about what it takes to launch oneself into orbit. Yet the movie doesn't delve much into Armstrong because Armstrong doesn't really delve into himself. As written by Singer and played by Gosling, Armstrong isn't a traditional square-chinned patriot or some mythical being. Rather, he's stoic and reserved, hiding his true thoughts and concerns inside of himself. Armstrong is taciturn (a trait Gosling has perfected at portraying) whose greatest strength as a pilot and greatest weakness as a human is detachment and an otherworldly cool. The depiction is something of a mixed bag. It keeps Armstrong grounded as a person, evading some ugly hero worshiping that has dinged other biopics and resulting in an interesting character because of the silence. If Armstrong is heroic, it's because of his actions, not his personality. The problem arises because the stoicism reflects against Janet, who is not fleshed out enough as a character to fully combat Armstrong's quiet. Janet instead is something of a trope, the supportive wife who has that one moment of verve before returning to her station, safe in the thought that she at least did something. Chazelle and Singer do offer her a decent amount of solo time, but they don't use it particularly well to build up her character. 
 
This would be more of an issue if First Man was really about Armstrong. It is nominally about the man, but the point is less that Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon, but there was a person there at all. Armstrong is necessary because he was the first, but Chazelle and Singer are far more interested in bring audiences up to the moon with him. Armstrong himself is effectively a vessel to get to the stars, a justification for Chazelle and cinematographer Linus Sandgren to take audiences to space. The trips to space veer wildly from sublime peace to pure horror when the danger lights start up and the sounds of imminent failure start blaring across the rickety hunks of metal thrown into space. But the best moment is the landing on the moon and the first steps on the surface, when the film and the audience are stunned into silence, caught up by the majesty of the moment.

Review: Four and a half out of Five Stars

Click here to see the trailer.

Rating: PG-13
Run time: 141 minutes
Genre: Biography

tl;dr

What Worked: Cinematography, Acting, Pacing

What Fell Short: Incomplete characterization for Janet Armstrong, political commentary

What To As Well: From the Earth to the Moon, Apollo 13

Thursday, November 16, 2017

Waiting for Superman

Ezra Miller, Ben Affleck, and Gal Gadot in Justice League. Image courtesy Warner Bros.
What makes the generally dire Justice League somewhat worth watching is Wonder Woman. Gal Gadot's fiery, intense warrior remains a delight to watch as she charges headfirst into a fight, sword and shield in hand ready to strike down the foes who oppose her. Aside from the satisfaction wrought from having Wonder Woman serve as the toughest character among a collection of super powered folks – a trait shared with the great Justice League animated show from the 2000s – Gadot gives the character a little charm to add a touch of humanity to her character. Some adaptations, for example recent video game entries, have centered her character on the character's warrior spirit they lose touch of the humanity that allows a god to embrace life among humans. DC has a good thing going with Wonder Woman, so it totally makes sense for the company to add a male version of her in the form of Jason Momoa's Aquaman. They’re effectively mirrors of each other, one serving to make the other moderately redundant. Because having a unique, distinguished female character is a step too far for DC, and Aquaman needs to do something besides speak to fish.
One way or another, DC can't get out of its own way when adapting its comic properties to film, which is the driving force of Justice League's failures. The decisions made in the filmmaking process by director Zack Snyder and writers Chris Terrio and Joss Whedon are more often than not wrong, resulting in a disjointed, slight movie instead of the powerful blockbuster the company needs. This was DC's shot at a franchise centerpiece, and it fell remarkably short of achieving that goal.
The most fundamental flaw with Justice League is a story that feels incomplete, as if key components were removed to keep the run time at around two hours. The movie brings back Wonder Woman and Ben Affleck's Batman (who spends the movie being fairly useless among his powerful friends) from, but takes time out for the origins of new heroes Aquaman, Cyborg (Ray Fisher), and Flash (Ezra Miller). All three will get their own movies in the next few years, but they are new to this DC Cinematic Universe, and Justice League has to take time to introduce all three from scratch. The process is clunky, stealing time away from the save the world narrative while missing opportunities to understand the team dynamic. DC would have been better served properly introducing Aquaman, Cyborg, and Flash in separate movies ahead of this one, as almost a third of this movie is devoted to introducing those three.
Cutting down on the new character introduction would then provide more time to focus on the aforementioned save the world story audiences came out to see. Justice League would benefit from additional time to flesh out an uninspiring, rote plot. Part of the issue is from the choice of villains – the alien Steppenwolf (voiced by Ciarán Hinds) is not a major DC villain, certainly not as intimidating as Darkseid or even a deranged Lex Luthor. Once the team of beings with godlike powers (and Batman) assembles, Steppenwolf's inevitable defeat becomes clear and anticlimactic. The build up of a grand battle to save the earth ends in an blasé fashion, concluded with neither of the movie’s two proud warriors, Wonder Woman and Aquaman, ending the battle with the killing blow.
If the plot feels a little familiar, that’s because Marvel already did it in The Avengers, although Marvel did a much more competent job. And it doesn’t take too close of a look to see where Snyder and crew lifted from other sources with small to no traces of shame. A flashback to a previous battle with Steppenwolf is formatted like a Lord of the Rings rip off. The bits about Lois Lane (Amy Adams) and the world losing hope after Superman's death (Henry Cavill) has elements of Ghostbusters II to it, and there’s a rather blatant rip off of Frankenstein. Throwing these elements together just makes the story feel weak, as if the writers weren’t confident in the path they chose for their superhero team.
The overarching vibe for Justice League is disappoint. Is this all DC has to offer for the most memorable superhero team of all time? A recycled plot with poor characterization is the best this company has to offer fans who've already been stuck with Dawn of Justice and Suicide Squad and murderous interpretations of otherwise pacifistic heroes? None of this bodes well for the impending Justice League sequel and the rest of the onslaught of DC movies, so strap in for a bumpy ride.

Review: Two out of Five Stars

Click here to see the trailer.

Rating: PG-13
Run time: 120 minutes
Genre: Action

Ask Away

Target audience: People who love DC Comics.

Take the whole family?: There's a lot of violence with minimal amounts of human blood, so for parents who are good with that this won't be too much for kiddos.

Theater or Netflix?: Really, really don't pay the extra money to see it.

What about the little things?: What irked me the most was how the little things kept getting messed up. Most notably is how every superhero calls each other by their real first names, no matter how close they are to, say, a group of cops or Bruce Wayne's employees. These heroes hide their identities for many, many reasons, and there's no way Batman would allow anyone to call him Bruce in open quarters.

Watch this instead?: Wonder Woman is the best of the recent DC Comics movie adaptation, although it still isn't that great. The Justice League cartoon from the 2000s is excellent, and the ongoing Justice League Action is pretty fun. If you do want to go out, just hit up Thor: Ragnarok and enjoy the madness that ensues.