Director Alfonso Gomez-Rejon on the set of "Me and Earl and the Dying Girl." Photo by Anne Marie Fox, © 2015 Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation. |
Here's part two of the question and answer session with the people behind "Me and Earl and the Dying Girl," featuring director Alfonso Gomez-Rejon and screenwriter Jesse Andrews, who wrote the book the script is based on. The discussion encompasses the motivation for the film, the "400 Blows," and a little interlude about Werner Herzog. Audio from the interview is available here.
Q: (To Alfonso Gomez-Rejon) Why did you
want to direct this film?
Alfonso Gomez-Rejon: It was a very
original piece of writing. We didn't know what to expect when someone
says there's this movie about high school, that you should read it.
You think of high school, you know exactly what it's going to look
like. Usually it deals with people I don't understand or don't relate
to, like jocks in high school who are never these six-foot guys with
a letterman jacket. Plus, I was Mexican in a town where you didn't
have to learn English.
“The Breakfast Club” specifically
is a movie I carry with me because it spoke to me and I identify with
Anthony Michael Hall's character so clearly and I hadn't seen
anything since then. But when I read his (Jesse Andrews') novel, I
really loved everybody; there was a deep sense of compassion that was
on the page for every character. And I particularly loved Greg's
journey; it kind of mirrored my own or one I wanted to take. It was
something I could throw myself into and make something from the heart
and also something that had a very unique sense of humor.
Q: So you thought you could be the
narrator like Greg?
Gomez-Rejon: I'm not that smart or that
funny, but his emotional journey is one I really respected. Visually,
also, it was an opportunity celebrate movies. Once you start seeing
the movie in your head your like OK, I'm hooked, I have to figure
this out. How do I get this out of my system? I have to get the job
done.
Q: Werner Herzog: Great director or the
greatest director? Because you guys reference him a lot.
Gomez-Rejon: He saw the movie and
enjoyed it.
Jesse Andrews: He sent an epic email.
Not epic long, just epic Werner Herzog definitely wrote this.
Gomex-Rejon: It's when you get your
inbox and it says “Werner Herzog” that this isn't a joke.
Andrews: Then you hung out with him.
Gomez-Rejon: I went to his house and
(he said) can I make you an expresso, for example. Then he led me to
the kitchen and making an espresso.
Andrews: Very German.
Gomez-Rejon: He is tied as one of the
greatest directors in the history of film.
Andrews: Tied with a lot of directors.
Q: Also referenced more than anything
else is Francois Truffaut's “400 Blows.” Of all the films to
pick, why that one?
Gomez-Rejon: The film is one of my
favorites, if not my favorite, and it has been for many, many years.
Truffaut captured life and captured that freedom … it was this
freedom you can sense was very palpable of them doing something new
and also capturing this very bittersweet story that's both very funny
and quite heartbreaking. Especially that last scene, which when I saw
for the first time I couldn't leave my seat, I couldn't stand, I
didn't know what to expect. When finally he (Antoine Doinel, played
by Jean-Pierre Léaud)
dreams of going to the beach and he finally gets there and he hits
another wall and can only go so far, it's just heartbreaking. That
movie just defined me in a lot of ways, of something I hope at some
point I can capture that feeling. (Truffaut) never talked down to the
kids, always treated them with so much respect; so much so that you
identify with that young kid.
Q: There are parallels between the boy
and Greg; they seem to be kids who are a bit misunderstood.
Gomez-Rejon: Very different in a lot of
ways, but that interior life, that journey is so complicated and you
feel such compassion for them. Also, what posters do you put on the
wall? You put up your favorite movies and you go from there. And it
was a way to pay homage to Truffaut.
Q: Both characters are finding
themselves through other voices, through film or through Balzac.
Gomez-Rejon: That's really interesting.
Sometimes when talking about it (“Me and Earl and the Dying Girl”)
and hearing about it, you keep learning about this movie. You're
absolutely right; sometimes it's a feeling there's no logic to.
Q: Something subliminal?
AGR: Exactly.
Q: Screenwriter Dan Fogelman was saying
how he helped you write the script. Can you talk about that a little
bit?
Andrews: Dan's the reason this is all
happening in a way. So I'd written the book, and the book was going
to be published. And that was already enough of this mind-blowing,
holy shit I'm a published author now I don't have to live the rest of
my life illegally disposing garbage out of the back of a truck among
other degrading jobs I have to do. At that point I was represented by
William Morris Endeavor, and they wanted to package the film rights
with someone who would make it more appealing, who would make this
project more appealing. So they showed the book to a number of
people, and one was Dan. He read the book, and said “I want to be
part of this, but I think maybe the author can write the script.”
And who knows why; that's an insane thing to think, I'm a totally
unproven commodity. He felt this had a strong voice and he felt maybe
the author should get the first crack at trying to coax that voice
into a script.
With Dan attached, it had become much
more appealing, this project. Then he really shepherded me through
this process of writing the script. I first had to read some scripts,
or at least a script, before writing. I didn't have Final Draft, I
really didn't know the form. I knew it was in Courier, I knew you
capitalized some words if you think they were really important. You
usually get a couple of words per paragraph maybe that you point to.
I didn't know the rules.
Dan, his process was very organic, and
very “I don't what you to learn more rules or shoulds and
shouldn'ts than you have to.” He let me make a ton of mistakes, and
some of them are still in there, and they look less like mistakes
than things that make this movie a little different than other
movies. That's how he works; some mistakes aren't mistakes, but you
don't know until you make them.
Q: How different is directing the young
kids than directing experienced actors? With experienced actors, you
tell them a scene and they get it in the first take.
Gomez-Rejon: No, no, no. Not
necessarily true. Not at all. You can have to 6-year-old actors and
they'll both need different things. Just say three (actors): One
actor may have a lot of training in a specific school and is married
to that process. Another actor may be like a version of RJ with no
training but just raw talent, and that is what keeps him pure. And
another person that turns it off quickly and turns it back on. It's
as simple as some actors like to talk and prepare, some people like
to feel it and then get notes afterward. And it's the exact same way
for teenagers and even child actors: Some child actors are so
schooled that it's about breaking them out of that, and some are just
absolutely raw. It's an intuitive thing; what does this actor need to
make them more comfortable.
(“American Horror Story: Coven”)
was an example: one day you could have teenagers, 20-somethings, and
Angela Bassett and Dennis O'Hare, Jessica Lange, Kathy Bates, Patti
LuPone, all in one day. Everyone just needs certain things: What a
12-year-old needs is the same thing an 80-year-old might need. It's
just what's best for them.
Q: How did you find a way to keep the
Greg character a realistic teenager without going too far? Teenage
boys are kind of the worst, but you don't want to necessarily slap
him around like Holden Caulfield.
Andrews: It's just an act of
calibration that you just labor over for a very long time until you
get it right, and you write it the wrong way once, twice, 10 times,
20 times, until you've finally written it the right way. It just
takes forever.
Teenage boys are the worst, but they
also contain things in them that are good. The world view of this
book, this movie, of anything I'd want to make, is anyone you see is
capable of surprising you, doing something unexpected that
contradicts and deepens and enriches your conception of them. You see
someone and you see a type, you say all right, this is this kind of
person, here's the kind of thing they say and do and think and like
and hate and so forth. And then they like or do something that
totally upends that.
Yeah, he's selfish, and yet he is
giving. His selfishness, his desire for invulnerability for example,
it's a function of how deeply and how unbearably strongly he feels.
He doesn't want to feel feelings because they're of such terrible
magnitude.
Q: In a weird way, his selfishness is
beneficial. Everyone else is talking about the cancer except for him,
so he serves as an escape for Rachel. Was that intentional?
Andrews: Nothing is ever the plan.
You're never like, here's the formula, this character's obnoxious but
she likes it. You create the kids first, you put them in the room
together second and then if it works it's because of these underlying
principles that you're describing. But it starts with just who's a
kid, who's a real kid, what's the real shit that he says, and does
she like that or does she hate that? Am I expecting her to like it
and in fact she hates it? Am I expecting her to hate it and in fact
she likes it? And when it works you just know, and then it's the
right thing. And that's the point when you've stopped writing the
wrong thing and started writing the right thing.
Q: What's in the future for both of
you?
Andrews: I wrote a book that got picked
up by my old publisher. I'm excited, and hopefully it comes out
spring of next year. I've written some screenplays too; it's great to
go back and forth between the two. They require different things of
you as a writer, so it's energizing to go from one to the other.
Gomez-Rejon: I've been trying to pick
my next project, but there are a lot of opportunities now. So I'm
taking my time and focusing on getting the word out on this movie
first.
No comments:
Post a Comment